Workforce Engagement Fundamentals: A Guide for Managers and Supervisors
nice huh?
It’s the title of my upcoming book, due out in August of this year. It even looks smart. Look at all the capital letters. And a colon too.
Even better, my name comes first on this one… That’s right, Drizin, Hundley. Not Hundley, Drizin. That bugged me. Yea, it’s petty. What of it?
Anyway I am still going through the data from my recently completed national benchmark and “shock” may be in line with my thoughts about the “Supervisor” data. Over the last decade I have seen the supervisors less and less engaged, however they still tended to more closely mirror the engagement of Senior Executives and Middle Managers. However, this year is different, and the implications for the future are ominous. In 2008, the Employee Hold’em National Benchmark revealed:
Executives/Senior Management 81% Fully Engaged, 12% Reluctant, 8% Unengaged
Middle Management 49% Fully Engaged, 24% Reluctant, 27% Unengaged
Supervisors 35% Fully Engaged, 30% Reluctant, 35% Unengaged
Individual Contributors 38% Fully Engaged, 26% Reluctant, 36% Unengaged
For the first time in a decade, every group other than senior leadership has a “Fully Engaged” level of less than 50%, and an Unengaged level of more than 25%.
Great way to end a weekend, huh? Who is taking care of your shop for the next two days??


